Science & Technology News

Smart students don't need to go to selective schools to succeed

The results of a new study by researchers at the University of Victoria in Australia challenge the belief that smart students need to attend selective schools to achieve good results and success.

Selective schools, such as gifted or model schools, are schools where only students with the best academic performance are admitted. Students take an entrance exam and those who get the highest marks are allowed to enroll.

Some say that smart students need these schools to achieve their best academic performance. Students from these schools can outperform non-profit school students on final exams without their parents having to pay the high school fees. Proponents of choice schools say they provide an opportunity for children from disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds to receive the best education possible.

But opponents say that these schools are for the benefit of rich families who hire private tutors for their children to get high marks in the entrance exams.

Studies They show Parents are interested in enrolling their children in selected schools; Because they believe that these schools increase the probability of their children's admission to top universities and employment in high-paying and respectable jobs.

To investigate the possible benefits of attending selective schools, a team of Victoria University researchers surveyed 3,000 students over 11 years. These students were fifteen years old at the beginning of this study in 2009. The researchers published the results of this study in British Journal of Educational Studies have published

The effect of selected schools on students' lives
Students of selected schools perform better in academic tests, but these schools have no significant effect on their future.

The role of selected schools in the academic and career future of students

As expected, in this study, students of selected schools scored higher in math and reading tests. However, between the ages of 19 and 25, the education and employment of the students of these schools did not differ much from the students of non-selective schools; For example, 81% of selected school students entered a secure job or university at the age of 19; While this number was 77.6% for students of non-selective schools. However, this difference disappeared when the researchers took into account key variables, such as socio-economic background, gender and geographic region.

At 25 years of age, there was no significant difference between the outputs of these two groups; Except that the students of selective schools had a higher overall satisfaction with their lives (with only 0.19 points of difference compared to the students of non-selective schools). Finally, the probability of attending university or being employed was similar for both groups.

Researchers say that these results show that studying in selected schools does not have significant benefits for people. On the other hand, the idea of ​​the existence of these government-supported schools makes governments discriminate in the education of children and give exclusive privileges to a few students.

Much of the research that focuses on selective schools only looks at short-term aspects of the student recruitment process and refines them. The present research shows that the critical evaluation of these schools with a wider perspective may question the idea of ​​their expansion.

Mhd Narayan

Bringing over 8 years of expertise in digital marketing, I serve as a news editor dedicated to delivering compelling and informative content. As a seasoned content creator, my goal is to produce engaging news articles that resonate with diverse audiences.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button