The concern of the Zionists after the threats of Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah / How has the equation “from Kiryat Shmune to Eilat” disturbed the invaders?
According to the report of Tasnim News Agency International Group, the speech yesterday evening by Seyyed “Hasan Nasrallah”, the Secretary General of Hezbollah, like his previous speeches, received wide attention from the Zionist media, and these media carefully monitored all of Sayyed Nasrallah's speeches and analyzed and evaluated them. They focused on 3 main points.
The first point of attention of the Hebrew media in this context, which caused widespread concern among the Zionists, was the threats of Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah to respond decisively to the crimes of the occupying army against civilians in southern Lebanon.
According to al-Mayadeen, the Zionist media announced in this regard, Nasrallah threatened with a very angry expression that this time the response to the attacks of the Israeli army in southern Lebanon, which targeted civilians this week, will be very different.
Nasrallah immediately implements his threats
Expressing their concern about the threats of the Secretary General of Hezbollah, these media emphasized that past experiences have taught the Israelis that Nasrallah carries out any threat he makes the next day. After the threats of the Secretary General of Hezbollah that the cost of targeting civilians will be very heavy and bloody for Israel, the state of alert has been raised in the north of Israel (occupied territories).
Eitan Dangut, a reserve general in the army of the occupying regime, in response to Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah's threats, said that Nasrallah's words mean the continuation of the escalation of the situation in the north and the possibility of a confrontation, which we must deal with seriously.
The Hebrew media also reflected that part of the speech of the Secretary General of Hezbollah, which was related to the exposure of the lies of the Zionists at the beginning of the Al-Aqsa Storm operation and after that against the Palestinian resistance fighters, and announced that Nasrallah rejected all the Israeli narratives that the Hamas forces committed murders and crimes. He denied that they were against Israeli civilians and emphasized that all these narratives are fabricated and there is no evidence to prove them.
But Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah's mocking of Yoav Gallant, the war minister of the occupying regime, was the third point that was noticed by the Hebrew media, and these media announced that Nasrallah said: Hezbollah has huge and accurate missiles that reach from Kiryat Shmoune to Eilat.
This speech by Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah was made a short distance from Hezbollah's big operation in Safad region in northern occupied Palestine in response to the occupation's crimes against Lebanese civilians. On Wednesday, the Hebrew media reported on Hezbollah's missile attack on the occupation army's military bases in Safad region, which was one of the biggest and most severe attacks by Hezbollah since the beginning of the war and caused heavy casualties to the occupation forces.
“Moshie Davidovich”, one of the senior officials of the northern settlements of occupied Palestine, stated in this context, “We live in the country of Nasrallah (Secretary General of Hezbollah) and he is the one who determines the equations in the north.” We ask Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, to wake up and realize that without security, there will be no northern region for Israel.
Avigdor Lieberman, the former Minister of War of the Zionist regime and the head of the “Israel Our Home” party, also said in this context that the red line drawn by Israel became a white flag (a sign of surrender to Hezbollah); Because Israel's war cabinet has surrendered to Hezbollah.
Roui Sharon, the military analyst of the Zionist Kan network, said in this regard that our situation in the northern region is really embarrassing for Israel. The residents of these areas cannot even dream that they have returned to their homes; Because we have not come close to any agreement.
end of message/
