Useless NATO/Ukraine talk therapy pays for becoming West's playground
It seems that the history of using NATO's speech therapy in the Ukraine war has also ended and the strategy of creating strategic crises from the West in Russia's peripheral environment has not been accompanied by their intended results.
Anna Science and Technology News Agency policy group– Hanif Ghaffari: These days, senior officials of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization cannot hide their concern about Russia's advances in the strategic areas of eastern Ukraine. In the meantime, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has emphasized that as long as the North Atlantic Treaty allies fulfill their promises to deliver more weapons to Kiev, it is not too late for “Ukraine's victory” over Russia. At the same time, the Secretary General of NATO has claimed that NATO member countries have not been able to support Kiev in recent months. Stoltenberg's allusion to America is clear in this speech. Even after the approval of the plan by the US House of Representatives, some Western sources have doubts about the delivery of weapons and even the allocation of national support approved by Congress to Kiev.
The fact is that the current crisis in Ukraine is the result of the creation of chronic strategic tensions by the leaders of the North Atlantic Treaty. According to the available evidence and documents, NATO leaders promised Zelensky before the Ukraine war that basically such a conflict (that too on such a large scale) would not happen, and even if such an event did happen, they would use all their forces against Ukraine. Russia will support. Even some unofficial sources say that the creation of no-fly zones over Kiev was one of these commitments. However, after the Ukraine war, the Atlanticists refused to fulfill some of their previous promises. Zelensky, as the key in the game of the NATO leaders in Kiev, considered himself obliged to keep quiet about this and follow the strategies and even tactics specified by the United States and other members of the North Atlantic Treaty. Zelensky has not even found the courage to raise many of his complaints to NATO leaders (especially the American and British officials) because of the dependence of his minimal political life on them.
Now the war in Ukraine has reached a critical point and Russia has sent a clear message to the West by taking over Bakhmut and Avdiyoka in recent months! In such a situation, senior NATO officials are trying to prevent the acceleration of the defeat of the country's army and government in the war by repeatedly promising Ukraine's membership in the North Atlantic Treaty and full support for Kiev. However, it seems that the history of using NATO's speech therapy in the Ukraine war has also ended and the strategy of creating strategic crises from the West in Russia's peripheral environment has not been accompanied by their desired results!
Meanwhile, the main loser in the field is none other than Zelensky. The one who turned his country into a playground for the West against Moscow instead of an independent international actor, and in the end, he was recognized by the international system and world public opinion as the main loser of this field. Undoubtedly, after the end of the war, Ukraine will have a very long and long way to return to the point before the conflicts, while there will be no real prospects for the country's membership in NATO or even the European Union.
Source: ANA
